Hi Daniel,
All 1.6.x sadly...
But it is OK - my colleague agrees that we can just convert the working
copies as required - this is probably better as then we do not have to
support some legacy crap forever :)
I am surprised though - that it is so unusual to want to build a DAV/SVN
proxy with pathname translation...
Cheers,
Tim
On 17/04/12 11:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
svn 1.7 is supposed to follow 301(permanent)/302(temporary) redirects.
Are you on 1.7.x?
Tim Watts wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:25:01 +0100:
Lorenz<lorenznl<at> yahoo.com> wrote:
Tim Watts wrote:
[...]
We're changing SVN servers from mod-dav-svn to SCM-Manager - and one
minor fly in the ointment is the style of our old repo URI, which was
of
the form:
is there a reason you can't just use 'svn relocate' on the working
copies?
--
Lorenz
Sir - you are a genius.
Yes - this would be fine. After all, if a repo working copy is based
off the old server (RIP) then operations will fail, acting as a call to
run svn relocate. Easy to do, easy to document...
I did not know about that operation.
Thanks :)
Tim
--
Tim Watts
Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/
--
Tim Watts
Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/
