On 02/03/2012 03:23 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:04:54PM +0100, Johan Holmberg wrote:
On 02/03/2012 02:50 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
I have now done some further experiments. I just issued commands like this:
$ svn status # no modified files reported
Subversion is not doing a full text comparison because the timestamps
match. So the difference that is present is not reported.
But this occurs right after a fresh "svn checkout". There can be no
differences.
You said these differences were always due to keyword expansion
or eol-style. Can you describe in more detail what the related
svn: property settings are, and how file content differs from
what you expect?
See my previous mail (the reply to Philip Martin).
To be really sure, I saved the file before/after my "touch + svn
status". The working copy file is identical before and after. But
first it is reported as unmodified and then as modified.
Seems like a bug.
It may well be. But we've stopped fixing bugs in the 1.6 working copy
implementation long ago. 1.6 receives fixes only for critical data
corruption issues for which no workaround exists, and security fixes.
Does the issue exist in Subversion 1.7?
I would like to try it with Subversion 1.7. How do I get a binary for
Ubuntu 10.10 or 11.10? I couldn't find any precompiled packages easily.
Or do I have to build it from source?
/Johan Holmberg
