In examining the Working Copy more closely, the Folder Structure is partially in 1.6 format and partially is 1.7 format. I am making this assumption by the presence of the .svn folder in some top level folders but not in others. A couple of files were deleted at the repository level prior to the attempt to convert the Working Copy to the 1.7 format. Since the Working Copy is on a network drive someone probably updated a subfolder to 1.7 before the full working folder was attempted to be converted which was when the failure and report below occurred. There are no externals associated with this Project Repository. I am not aware of any changes to nodes. We do make commits from this working copy but would not be able to do so following the upgrade of the SVN Server to 1.7 until after the upgrade of the working copy to the 1.7 Format.
Keith -----Original Message----- From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 4:58 AM To: Keith Williams Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Attmpting to Update Working Directory for a Project from V1.6.17 to V1.7.1 using SVN Upgrade working copy Keith Williams <kwilli...@sauer-danfoss.com> writes: > Subversion reported the following > (you can copy the content of this dialog to the clipboard using > Ctrl-C): > > In file > 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.1\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c' > line 1654: assertion failed (parent_node || entry->schedule == > svn_wc_schedule_normal) That looks like one we haven't seen before. I think this occurred during an upgrade, so the working copy should still be in the 1.6 format. If we are to do anything with this report then we need to know what is special/different about this working copy. How old is the working copy? What does 'svn status' show? What local changes do you have? Any added/deleted nodes? Switched nodes? Mixed revisions? Is it a sparse working copy? Any svn:externals, file or directory? Do you make commits from this working copy? Is it nested inside another working copy? -- Philip
