Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: > I agree that special-casing the root_dir seems unnecessary even in the > mirroring case, provided that nested Locations are supposed to work.
I don't understand the "provided ..." bit. It seems to be flat out wrong. If I fix the line then nested mirroring works when using SVNParentPath, with 1.7 the commits fail even using the v1 protocol. > Maybe this was done to guarantee consistent mirroring behaviour when > Locations using SVNPath are nested accidentally? Even then, it seems > bad to silently try to work around the problem instead of signaling > a configuration error to the admin. I don't understand how that would work. -- Philip
