On 11/01/2011 07:56 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de > <mailto:s...@elego.de>> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 06:29:59PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote: > > I put in the ORDER BY to preserve the parents before children > > notification used by 1.6. I wonder if that notification order is > > important? > > See r1196191. > It should preserve the 1.6.x order (via svn_path_compare_paths()). > > > Just a side note. I have not been able to find a "final" version of the > svnbench tool with results for 1.7.0 compared with 1.6.17. The results I > can find are only comparing 1.7.x with trunk. Just wondering if those tests > show a problem with rm so that we can track progress via those tests. > > Adding Neels in case he archived any results.
Have not, but I will gladly kick off a special run for you. (...some time passes...) See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-11/0029.shtml *Disclaimer:* this tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM. This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working copy layer, only. These results are *not* generally true for everyone. It seems to show an improvement on 'svn delete' for 1.7.0. ~Neels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
