On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:12:04AM -0600, michael_rytt...@agilent.com wrote: > I did an additional benchmark doing "svn rm dir/*" on a local > directory instead of an nfs directory. It runs in 10.4s. Is going > from 10.4s to 6m15s acceptable when using a working copy on nfs vs > local? I am fine with a certain amount of slowdown when using nfs. > But, I don't see this kind of degradation on nfs vs local for other > operations. Svn rm seems particularly susceptible. >
I've taken a stab at fixing this, see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1195873 Would you be able to test a patch against 1.7.x? There are some conflicts when the above commit is merged into the 1.7.x branch, so I'll have to prepare a special patch for 1.7.x.
