On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:15 AM, rmp8...@googlemail.com
<rmp8...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer!
> Hm ok. SVN is not the best solution but is it impossible by that fact?
> The example is abstract for a bigger problem, so my chief interest lay in
> feasibility and the way how to do it.
I'd expect this to work only in the case where the copied repository
is a strict backup of the one actively used - in which case svnsync is
probably an easier approach to updating the backup copy. It will
certainly break if any other changes are made directly to the copy and
I don't think you can remove older revisions from your active
instances like you described.
> Otherwise we have to transform much data into Git etc.
git-svn might be a good fit if you don't mind using the git interface
for your work and have room for the local copy. It can push your
changes back to a central svn repo in a way that can deal with other
concurrent work.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
