Guten Tag Andreas Krey, am Freitag, 23. September 2011 um 08:00 schrieben Sie:
> The svn user interface (at least the one that > is ontopic here, namely the 'svn' CLI) is horrible, mostly due to > the fact that svn only pretends to have branches and doesn't have > tags at all. (It replaces them by a convoluted history tracking, and > by forcing each installation to write commit triggers, respectively.) I didn't write any commit triggers regarding tags until now, but am able to use them. I don't see the coherence to a good cli either. > That is usually not a problem. You just have a central 'blessed' repo, and > what isn't (pushed) there doesn't officially exist. Just like in an svn > setting what is not committed does not exist. The simple difference is, that a commit in SVN is enough. With git the dev has to commit and the push must be organized somehow, too. > 'They don't have the repo' is just an illusion. Agreed. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning AM-SoFT IT-Systeme - Hameln | Potsdam | Leipzig Telefon: Potsdam: 0331-743881-0 E-Mail: tschoen...@am-soft.de Web: http://www.am-soft.de AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Konsumhof 1-5, 14482 Potsdam Amtsgericht Potsdam HRB 21278 P, Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
