On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:13:22 +0000, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > ... > > Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the developer > > modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical > > modifications to the corresponding pristine files in .svn/text-base > > (frequently this happens when using a batch search-replace tool). > > This would lead me to hope that svn 1.7 will not store the pristine > copies unobfuscated (like, compressed or in a database) so they are not > that easily found.
Nope, 1.7 won't obfuscate pristines in any way. But you can filter them out via the filename pattern '*.svn-base' (as you already can do with 1.6).
