kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:03:52 -0500: > Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote on 06/30/2011 09:24:56 AM: > > kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 09:06:28 > -0500: > > > Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote on 06/30/2011 07:35:36 > AM: > > > > I'm going to say this even more clearly: > > > > > > > > If you backup a repository by copying its files while a server is > > > > running, the backup may be created corrupted. > > > > > > > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7#single-db (sic) > > > > > > This does not seem point to any additional warnings about the server > > > side yet (only the client)... > > > > By the way: that's exactly why I added the "(sic)" marker after the URL > > --- to indicate that it's not the wrong URL, even though it talks about > > the wc and this thread is about the server's backend. > > > > I suppose the text could be made clearer. > > I was wondering about the (sic). Yes, if that portion applies to > the server as well, it needs to have the heading changed to > "server and client" like the rest of the sections, or I think this > statement might warrant it's own section for the server only impact. >
Fair enough. I'll make the release notes clearer. > (And I'll raise this issue on the dev list. I'd love to have > revprop packing, but not at this cost...) > (I see you already did so; thanks; given the 1.7.x branch is getting nearer it was important to start this thread relatively soon.) > Kevin R.
