On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:18:54PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > There doesn't seem to be a duplicated block. The revision file itself seems > > to be fine, expect that one of the lengths of the bad rev doesn't seem to > > Huh? Are you referring to the two 'length' attributes in the text: and > data: attributes of a node-revision? In what way is it wrong?
I don't remember exactly. I'll need a bit of time to dig into the file again before I can give a precise answer.
