Op maandag 21 mrt 2011 17:57 CET schreef Nico Kadel-Garcia: >> As I understood it, the best way to setup subversion is just with >> svnserve. Because it is accessed through the Internet, we should also >> SASL. >> >> It looks like the passwords are then stored in a text-file. Which >> means that when an user want to change his password, the maintainer of >> the svnserver has to change the password and mail it to the user. Is >> this correct, or am I overlooking something? > > Cecil, there are trade-offs. Do go to the redbook at > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/. svnserve works, but is not automatically > encrypted, and has poor logging. HTTP/HTTPS access can be set to > encryption, but the UNIX/Linux clients store passwords in cleartext > locally, which I personally consider absolute anathema. svn+ssh works, > but handling the SSH public keys is awkward and has no tool for easy > management of access. > > They've all got trade-offs: different ports need to be acessible for > clients, for example. SASL, in particular, *CAN* be managed by > authorized users from offsite, but it requires more infrastructure.
I already was reading the redbook. I think I first just implement SASL to get things on the road. When that works, I'll look at the offsite management. Is that in the redbook? I can not remember seeing it. But maybe I overlooked something. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof