Hello,
I encountered the behaviour that  looks like a bug.
I work with a quite big repository (local copy on my PC (x86, winXP SP3) has 
about 8GB
I did the following.
I started with the directory tree marked by the overly icon "normal" at the 
trunk node, I believe, that all was correct.
I start with the  .xls file on the  8th level of the directory tree (with trunk 
on 1th). The file needed  acquiring a lock to be  changed.
1. I opened the file with MSexcel and tried to write it. Excell refused to do 
it, I closed excel.
2. I got the lock and opened the file again. I tried to write it, excel refused 
to do it because it thought that the file is read-only. I wrote the file with 
modified name
3. I closed the excel
4. I renamed the file to its original name using the file manager. It asked 
about overwriting, I confirmed.
Now I had modified file, which had not been committed.
5. I tried to do update on the trunk. svn marked with the red "modified{" icon 
the branch of the directory tree ( all its nodes, except the file itself) in 
which the file was located
6. I renamed the modified file and then I did the update on the trunk  The last 
revision of the file was written in my local copy, but the tree still had been 
marked wit the "modified" icon .
7. I did  the update of the trunk once again and I got the following error 
message:

Command: Update
Error: Failed to add directory 'E:\ld\pgnig\new_repo\trunk': a versioned 
directory of
Error: the same name already exists
Finished!:

I did the clean-up on trunk, svn reported it to be successful, but the next 
update on trunk ended with the same error message.

I used the following version:
TortoiseSVN 1.6.12, Build 20536 - 32 Bit , 2010/11/24 20:59:01
Subversion 1.6.15,
apr 1.3.8
apr-utils 1.3.9
neon 0.29.5
OpenSSL 0.9.8p 16 Nov 2010
zlib 1.2.3

I encountered this behaviour several times, usually I had to remove the 
reported directory and get the fresh copy with update, but the size of the 
repository is too big to mean this as a valuable work-around

Sincerely yours,
Leszek Dabrowski





Reply via email to