On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Andy Levy <andy.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 16:30, Phil Pinkerton <pcpinker...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 1) Does Tortoise just send command to the Subversion Windows Command >> Line client? > > No, it is not a wrapper. TortoiseSVN is built on top of the Subversion > client libraries. > >> 2) Can the Tortoise and/or Subversion Windows Command Line client be >> configured to reduce and/or eliminate with small pack CIFS traffic >> that occurs during the check out process to a Windows network drive? > > No. The next-generation WC format (coming with 1.7) may improve > performance, but Subversion checkout operations are very I/O > intensive. Some filesystems handle it better than others. > >> -maybe "trust" the check out and run an update status as a >> separate operation to get the status information validated >> >> -turn off the status feature during the check out and then turn it on > > TortoiseSVN's TSVNCache by default does not check network drives. > >> -other options (i.e. ini or xml) file the client use to turn the >> client or other specific knowledge you have about the client we can >> tune >> >> 3) Are there options around the Export which is very fast but does not >> write out any of the .svn file that we can use to speed up the client >> and get our status information? > > Not if you want to maintain the connection to the repository. > >> 4) Is the another GUI Subversion client that has better performance >> when content is being checked out to a Windows network drive. > > You won't find much variation, because they almost all use the same > core libraries or code.
What about SvnAnt ?
