On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Jack Repenning wrote: > If you do switch to the approach Stefan suggests (and I agree, it's > probably more satisfactory) you also might want to use "svn switch" > instead of the svn:externals. You'll still have the auditable, > versioned definition of your canonical configuration (in the form of > the script), but also there will be more freedom for variations, such > as while preparing a new configuration.
Right. But note that switched subtrees cannot come from a different repository.
