On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Itamar O <itamar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:11 AM, David Darj <z...@alagazam.net> wrote: >> >> You can get my build on http://alagazam.net >> >> /David > > David, > Thanks for the binaries. > Any chance you get build also x64 packages? > (especially bindings and .so modules) > > Thanks, > Itamar.
Good. I requested that RPMforge update a day or two ago, and they're available at RPMforge for RHEL 5: the dependency chain has become too large and awkward for RHEL 4 to continue trying to backport it to an OS 5 years old. Note that if you use RPMforge and have a system that's installed with x86_64 RHEL, you'll wnat to remove the i386 versions of subversion before trying to upgrade with RPMforge, because RPMforge doesn't follow RedHat's practice of providing both i386 and x86_64 unnecessarily in the x86_64 repository. If you don't do this, the conflict between RedHat's last i386 version, which 1.4.x based, will cause weird conflicts with the x86_64, 1.6.13 release published last night. Anyone using Subversion on RHEL, I urge you to make sure you've updated to RHEL 5 and to use the RPMforge repository. RedHat has no intentions of upgrading their subversion on the older releases, and the updates are well worth the effort for performance and security reasons, and for compatibility of Samba shared working copies with TortoiseSVN.
