Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:25:27 -0500: > On 9/29/2010 11:11 AM, Alan Barrett wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> It would have made sense to me to have the config/scripts versioned >>> but I've forgotten how that worked in CVS and I'm too lazy to look >>> it up. And I suppose it would be hard to change now in a >>> backwards-compatible way since svn doesn't keep the head version as >>> a normal file like cvs/rcs. >> >> I make my hooks directory a working copy of an appropriate subdirecrory >> in the repository (or in another repository), and use a post-commit >> hook to run "svn update" in the hooks dir when it sees a commit to the >> relevant path. > > Does that cause trouble when the post-commit script itself is updated > while running - or does svn always write new files and rename when > complete which should at least work on unix-like systems?
I'm pretty sure we don't let you end up with a half-written file in the working copy. But let's hope the 'svn update' never runs into a conflict, or things are going to get interesting.... > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.com > >
