On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 21:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:03, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:17, Andy Levy <andy.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:14, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: ... >> 2b. home server: individual users have clones of bazaar master repo, >> keep inn sync with master bazaar repo on home server > > I've not touched that toolkit. I like git because I've found the > svn2git migration easy, the handling of authentication and integrated > GPG signing of authorized tags very helpful, and the merge functions > welcome. The improved centralization control that it lauds is > *precisely* one of the major factors that distributed systems don't > want, but it does have other intersting features. However, both > Subversion and git are supported on my faviorite major open source > repository, sourceforge.net. bazaar is not. > > If you have the chance to try, how well do the bazaar/subversion > integration tools work? I admit that I enjoy being able to work > locally with git, and push and pull upstream as necesasry with the > git-svn toolkits and their proxy like handling for Subversions's. more > broadly supported central repositories.
Well, I'm biting the bullet tomorrow. I'll report back later tomorrow or the next day to give you my first impressions. Cheers! -Tom
