On 23 August 2010 19:18, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Campbell Allan wrote on Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:10:28 +0100: >> >> On Sunday 22 Aug 2010, Andy Levy wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 14:16, Steven Woody <narkewo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > On 20 August 2010 23:19, Steven Woody <narkewo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> Hi, >> > >> >> > >> With a replication/write-through setup, can a user execute 'svn lock' >> > >> on master/slaver nodes? Thanks. >> > > >> > > Hey folks, no one can gives me a hint? >> > >> > You asked at the beginning of a weekend and no one is obligated to >> > reply within a set timeframe (or at all, for that matter). If you need >> > an answer that fast, it costs you nothing to set up a master/slave >> > pair to test it for yourself (and you'd be done by now if you'd >> > started Friday). >> >> I mentioned in your previous thread their isn't support in svnsync and this >> would require a third party script to maintain the locks. > > Yeah, either the pre-lock hook on the mirror could run 'lock' on the > master manually, or someone could go ahead and patch mod_dav_svn to do > that directly in the C code. > > I'm pretty sure I saw/heard of such a pre-lock hook somewhere... > > Daniel >
Thank you everyone. Maybe I really need to do some tests. I think there is no problem to setup multiple instances of subversion. I did not do experiment before is because that server is really serious one. -- Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence -- Schopenhauer narke public key at http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371 (narkewo...@gmail.com)
