Andy Peters wrote on Mon, 26 Apr 2010 at 15:59 -0700:
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Andy Peters wrote on Mon, 26 Apr 2010 at 11:28 -0700:
> >> ... spoke too soon. svn doesn't like an empty fsfs.conf file; it
> >> complains about missing section headers when trying to do an update or
> >> whatever.
> >>
> >
> > I can't reproduce this with trunk or 1.6.x.
>
> I suppose I should be clearer. Without fsfs.conf, the Subversion client
> complained.
I do not get a complaint with an empty or non-existent fsfs.conf:
% cd /tmp
% svnadmin create r
% svn co -q file:///tmp/r wc1
% svn up -q wc1
% rm -f r/db/fsfs.conf
% svn up -q wc1
% touch r/db/fsfs.conf
% svn up -q wc1
%
(same output with 1.6.x and trunk)
