Folks, I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11 announced a few days ago.
In hope... ~ Mark C >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Troy Simpson <t...@ebswift.com> wrote: >> A minimum level of support would be a good thing to agree >> on. Bear in mind the pre-stated >> complexities in handling too many supported installations. >> Maybe start at the baseline of 2.2x >> apache support and see if a volunteer is able to deliver >> builds for that? > > When you talk about Apache 2.2 support I assume you mean you need > mod_dav_svn and not just to have SVN compiled against Apache 2.2's > version of APR? > > One other "pain" I thought of is that ideally the binaries should be > built using MSVC 6.0 (I am assuming DJ has not changed that). Since > the httpd binaries are built using that you can have problems if a > newer Visual Studio is used for mod_dav_svn. You also have to deal > with distributing the MS runtime libraries if a newer version is used. > > The "pain" is that is not possible to obtain a legal copy of MSVC 6.0 > anymore. So unless you already have a copy you cannot get it. > > Building with Visual Studio 2008 is a lot simpler but has these other > problems to contend with. >