On Mar 30, 2010, at 18:55, Xavier Noria wrote: > Can I tell to svn that it totally forget revisions < 3000 ?
Doing so is a very invasive procedure. I don't recommend it. It's likely to cause more problems than it solves. > Those are > very old and we could just get rid of them it there was a chance that > it solved the issue, it is a pity we need to deal with explicit > revisions all the time, reflective merges... > > I don't know, perhaps around r2909 people did something with the repo, > upgrading, ... no idea.
