Thanks for the info. >See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2009-08/0274.shtml In mentioned example apache runs on worker mpm. I've sent a message to this group few days ago about users experience with svn and worker mpm. I didn't get any answer. It concerns me if svn is thread-safe and if the said memory problem would appear on prefork mpm. I will be doing some tests this week. Regards Leszek
On 9 March 2010 11:05, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:03:33AM +0100, Leszek Szarlej wrote: > > Hi > > > > In svn book ver. 1.0 there is written: > > "Deflate compression places a small burden on the client and server to > > compress and decompress network transmissions as a way to minimize the > size > > of the actual transmission. In cases where network bandwidth is in short > > supply, this kind of compression can greatly increase the speed at which > > communications between server and client can be sent. In extreme cases, > this > > minimized network transmission could be the difference between an > operation > > timing out or completing successfully." > > In the same book in version 1.5 there is no word about why/why not. Is it > > mean that mod_deflate is not recomended for current versions of svn? I > did > > tests on svn 1.6.9 and compression rate is about 30-40 percent and > checkout > > times are ~30% less > > I don't know why that paragraph was dropped from the book. > > But there's an unrelated problem with using mod_deflate together with > mod_dav_svn. It can cause memory leaks. > See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2009-08/0274.shtml > > Stefan >
