On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 15:16, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Andy Levy <andy.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've found several references to this problem via Google & the list >> archives, but never any answers. >> >> When checking out from *some* clients (one in particular), I get the >> following errors in my Apache error log on a regular basis: >> >> [Fri Jan 15 12:33:57 2010] [error] [client IP] Provider encountered an >> error while streaming a REPORT response. [500, #0] >> [Fri Jan 15 12:33:57 2010] [error] [client IP] A failure occurred >> while driving the update report editor [500, #190004] >> >> My SVN server is CollabNet's distribution of 1.5.2 running on Windows >> 2003 with the default configuration of Apache that's included. > > This is usually an issue with the client where it is not responding > fast enough and the server thinks the connection has been dropped. > For example, the client can spend so long writing the working copy > that the server thinks it dropped. > > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#secure-connection-truncated > > There is a timeout in the httpd.conf you can set to make the server > wait longer. I do not recall what it is off the top of my head. > > I think if you changed the client to use Serf instead of Neon you > would also avoid this problem. Neon does this all as one giant HTTP > request, where as Serf breaks it up into lots of smaller GET requests. > So I do not think Serf would likely timeout. > > You should be able to just edit the %AppData%\Subversion\servers file > on the client to tell it to use Serf over Neon (assuming your binaries > support it). > > [global] > http-library = serf > > If Anthill uses SVNKit then I am not sure what you can do other than > increase the timeout on the server.
I'll experiment some with the client config this morning, thanks. I'm not presently capturing User-Agent in my httpd logs - if I was, would that help me identify whether a client is using Serf or Neon?
