Plus it won't delete the file if there are local modifications in it.
I don't think the behavior is wrong, BTW. If I delete a file then I don't want
it to be there and compile against it. It would also be inconsistent with other
commands. svn mv does a move both in svn and the filesystem and then rm wouldn't.
Regards,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
CTO, OrcaWare Technologies
<bl...@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
Bob Archer wrote:
You can also use:
svn rm --keep-local
BOb
*From:* Mahi Haile [mailto:begin.middle....@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2010 2:13 PM
*To:* users@subversion.apache.org
*Subject:* svn rm should be 'fixed'
I really like svn. I use it everyday.
But I really dislike 'svn rm', because I make the mistake everyday. I
always want to remove something from the repository and use it, but end
up deleting the file on the local machine. Especially bad when I just
added the file, or there are changes on it I have not saved yet.
I have come to think of it more as a bug than a feature. I think 'svn
rm' should do just that -- rm from the repository rather than the local
file as well.
Thank you,
