On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:12:36PM +0100, Erik Huelsmann wrote: >> There's a fundamental difference in how the svn client and TSVN >> operate: TSVN creates all its files with full paths. In that case, the >> maximum length of a file name on windows is 65k bytes. >> >> The way the SVN client does it is different: it uses relative paths. >> In that scenario the maximum file name length of the relative file >> name on Windows is 256 bytes. >> >> Given the above, it could very well be you're looking at the Windows >> limitation. > > Why isn't the behaviour the same even though both clients use > the svn libraries?
Because the libraries operate on whatever they're given. TSVN always passes full paths, whereas the user probably doesn't. Bye, Erik.
