Sorry, was thinking this was about doc values as stored... but re-reading that might not be the case (a mail client adding RE: is messing up the threading here)... Another common problem is if you are using old schemas from old versions, some of the "by default" stuff is based on the default schemas... so if you have an old default schema as your original source, these things may not be up to date.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:23 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: > check your schema version attribute > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/server/solr/configsets/_default/conf/managed-schema.xml#L41 > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:43 AM Poorna Murali <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If docValues are enabled by default for string field, then the sort >> queries >> on the field will not occupy field cache and would rather rely on >> docValues. But in our case, it is filling up the field cache and that is >> the reason we are planning to enable docValues for that field. >> Is this functionality version specific? >> >> On 2022/06/07 12:35:39 Vincenzo D'Amore wrote: >> > "string" field type usually has "docValues"=true as default. >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:22 AM Poorna Murali <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > We have an id field(unique key) in our schema as follows, >> > > <field name=“id” type=“string” indexed=“true” stored=“true” >> required=“true” >> > > multiValued=“false”/> >> > > >> > > We are planning to introduce docValues to this field to save >> fieldcache >> > > space. My understanding on this is that, going forward all the sort or >> > > faceting done on id field will make use of docValues and since the >> stored >> > > flag is true for this field normal search will continue to retrieve id >> from >> > > stored fields.The field cache will then not have id field. >> > > >> > > >> > > Please correct me if my understanding is wrong. >> > > >> > > Also, will there be any other performance impact with this change, for >> > > example, query time taking longer than before? >> > > >> > > Thanks & Regards, >> > > Poorna >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Vincenzo D'Amore >> > >> > > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play) > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)
