Hello Joel,

Am 27.05.21 um 22:20 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
Hi

Community input is needed and appreciated!

The #rtems IRC server (freenode.net <http://freenode.net/>) has undergone some turmoil and we need to discuss what to do. This email provides some hopefully unbiased background on the Freenode situation, the options I identified, and my personal recommendation.

If you follow the nerdy type of news, you may be aware of some serious turmoil. I won't even try to rehash all the news but the basic outline is that the owner of the domain name has pushed some uncool things, forcing some elected leaders out, most/all the volunteers have left, etc. There is some concern that any information on freenode will be commercialized. This isn't much except for registered users who have a nickname and password. That much should all be covered here with lots of links.

https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/ <https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/>

This is a starting point to read things from the volunteer viewpoint that was posted to a GCC mailing list:

https://gist.github.com/joepie91/df80d8d36cd9d1bde46ba018af497409 <https://gist.github.com/joepie91/df80d8d36cd9d1bde46ba018af497409>

At this point, open source projects are bailing on Freenode for libera.chat which was founded and setup by Freenode volunteers. I saw over 400 projects have moved to the libera.chat. Showing the tone of what's happening at Freenode, if libera.chat was mentioned in a channel, the admins for that channel had their permissions removed and new admins were assigned. This has only increased the rate of the exodus.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkbgvg/major-internet-projects-are-leaving-freenode-after-korean-prince-takeover <https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkbgvg/major-internet-projects-are-leaving-freenode-after-korean-prince-takeover>

Our Discord setup seems to be doing well and is more active than I ever saw on IRC. The question to the community is what should we do? Options are:

(1) Drop Freenode and IRC entirely. Focus on Discord
(2) Drop Freenode. Add libre.chat (or another). Still keep Discord
(3) Drop Freenode. Drop Discord. Focus on IRC on libre.chat (or another).

I'm leaning to (1) but whatever we do, the git commit -> IRC bot is down/broken and will have to be addressed. If we commit completely to Discord, we need bot(s) there and git commits need to go to Discord.


I still think it's a bit odd to say "Drop Freenode" because Freenode seems to go into a more commercial direction but at the same time say that the Discord (which seems to be commercial through and through) is a good alternative.

In other words: As long as we don't mind using Discord, I would just keep the Freenode IRC just like it is.

Even if we go with (1), it may make sense to claim #rtems on the two IRC servers that open source projects are moving to. Just in case something else happens, we will have those channels reserved and some admins lined up. But we can leave them unused.

Note that some users might find these channels and try to get support there.


If anyone knows or wants to now about Discord bots, I am sure help would be appreciated.

Seems that Discord supports web hooks:

https://discord.com/developers/docs/resources/webhook#execute-webhook

So it's more or less generating json-data.

Best regards

Christian


What does everyone thing should happen?

--joel

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users


--
--------------------------------------------
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Christian MAUDERER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 18
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to