On Mon, Feb 1, 2021, 11:36 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > Indeed. It seems the sha512 has changed. The file doesn't appear to be > different on the http server. I found a copy at > https://download.videolan.org/contrib/jpeg/ that has a matching sha512sum > as we expect in the RSB. > > I compared those two tar files, and found this: > > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 4807 May 2 2010 makejvcx.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 3595 May 2 2010 makecvcx.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 3595 May 2 2010 makedvcx.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2876 May 2 2010 makervcx.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 3535 May 2 2010 maketvcx.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2876 May 2 2010 makewvcx.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2288 May 2 2010 makecfil.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2288 May 2 2010 makedfil.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 1142 May 2 2010 makerfil.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2123 May 2 2010 maketfil.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 1142 May 2 2010 makewfil.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 1859 May 1 2010 makeasln.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 679 May 1 2010 makejsln.v10 > --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 5789 May 1 2010 makejfil.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 4804 May 2 2010 makejvcx.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 3592 May 2 2010 makecvcx.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 3592 May 2 2010 makedvcx.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2873 May 2 2010 makervcx.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 3532 May 2 2010 maketvcx.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2873 May 2 2010 makewvcx.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2285 May 2 2010 makecfil.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2285 May 2 2010 makedfil.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 1139 May 2 2010 makerfil.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 2120 May 2 2010 maketfil.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 1139 May 2 2010 makewfil.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 1856 May 1 2010 makeasln.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 676 May 1 2010 makejsln.v10 > +-rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare 5786 May 1 2010 makejfil.v10 > > It appears that someone has removed some unicode characters or similar ( > <8b>¯¨ ) from the file header line > +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > of all these .v10 files in the ijg.org download, without somehow > modifying the file metadata. >
Grrr.. they should have changed the version! Is there a newer version? Is there a way to report this to them? > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:03 AM Matt Rippa <mri...@gemini.edu> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a quick test here that fails. This worked a few weeks ago. >> >> Thanks, >> -Matt >> >> mkdir quick-test >> cd quick-test/ >> git clone https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-source-builder.git rsb >> cd rsb/ >> git checkout 5 >> cd rtems >> ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --source-only-download 5/bsps/pc >> >> RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 5 (803d42cda7b3) >> Build Set: 5/bsps/pc >> Build Set: 5/rtems-i386.bset >> Build Set: 5/rtems-autotools.bset >> Build Set: 5/rtems-autotools-internal.bset >> config: tools/rtems-autoconf-2.69-1.cfg >> package: autoconf-2.69-x86_64-linux-gnu-1 >> Creating source directory: sources >> download: https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/autoconf-2.69.tar.gz -> >> sources/autoconf-2.69.tar.gz >> downloading: sources/autoconf-2.69.tar.gz - 1.8MB of 1.8MB (100%) >> config: tools/rtems-automake-1.12.6-1.cfg >> ...SNIP... >> Build Set: graphics/libjpeg.bset >> config: graphics/libjpeg-9a-1.cfg >> package: libjpeg-v9a-i386-rtems5-1 >> download: http://www.ijg.org/files/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz -> >> sources/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz >> downloading: sources/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz - 976.5kB of 976.5kB (100%) >> warning: checksum error: jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz >> error: checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz >> Build FAILED >> error: checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz >> Build Set: Time 0:00:01.201104 >> error: checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz >> Build Set: Time 0:00:05.636248 >> error: checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a.tar.gz >> Build Set: Time 0:01:05.610093 >> Build FAILED >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
