On 13/02/2020 16:37, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I would like to revisit this configuration clean up opportunity:
On 09/04/2019 14:55, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/04/2019 14:50, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 2:08 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
Hello,
is the CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_INIT_TASK_TABLE actually used in
application
configurations?
After sending that last email, this one is more likely to be used
than any of the others.
Not responding to an email on the list doesn't mean it isn't used.
If this option is deleted, the comparable POSIX one must go. then
you get a single init task of one or both APIs.
This one actually doesn't cause great pain to me at the moment. I
just wanted to know if it actually used. Removing it would simplify
things a bit, but not much.
The CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_INIT_TASK_TABLE and
CONFIGURE_POSIX_HAS_OWN_INIT_THREAD_TABLE are the last *_HAS_OWN_*
configuration options. I would like to remove them to simplify the
configuration. It would be possible to keep them and still simplify
the configuration, however, I doubt that these options were used at all.
Any objections to remove them?
I plan to remove them next week:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3873
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3874
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
