Although there does need to be a 5.x release, the www-new.rtems.org site was/is an experiment and shouldn't be treated as official.
As far as the release 5.x goes, all work toward making a release is done by unpaid volunteers. There are a number of tickets which need triaging and deferring as a minimum. Fixing is preferable. We aren't getting enough tool build results posted. And there certainly aren't enough BSP test runs being posted. Sebastian and I periodically do tool builds on our preferred hosts but that doesn't give the broad coverage we need. I post results on a few simulators. This ignores the time required to cut a release. Invariably something has changed or is broken that has to be fixed before a release can be made. It typically takes 2-3 weeks to tidy everything up and package it. I'm not blaming you. You just reported a broken link. I just thought it was an opportunity to point out the challenges in getting releases made. --joel On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:27 AM Steven Grunza <steven.gru...@gmail.com> wrote: > The link on https://www-new.rtems.org/release/ for the Latest Stable > 5.0.0 is https://www-new.rtems.org/release/5.0.0/ > > Selecting that link returns a "Not Found" error message: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /release/5.0.0/ was not found on this server. > > > If 5.0.0 didn't happen then maybe the link should be removed or an > explanation text ReadMe.txt added. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
