On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 2:13 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> ----- Am 25. Jul 2019 um 20:59 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org: > > > Having a separate library for rtems default configuration breaks autoconf > > probes for packages which are built using BSP specific arguments. These > > have built the same way for well over a decade. > > > > I know this can be resolved by passing in an extra library on the > configure > > line. But this broke a public behavior in an undesirable and subtle way. > > I think we have to make a trade-off between difficult to figure out > configuration issues which normally need the help of a linker map file (I > don't think the average user knows what this is) and an extra option for > already complicated Autoconf invocations. > Is there any documentation on this flag and how it might be needed? I am not suggesting changing this -- just stating that it had a visible side-effect that I don't recall getting the discussion that publicly visible behavior changes should get. --joel
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
