On 20/08/2018 16:01, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 20/08/18 05:12, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 17/08/2018 02:21, Aaron Bufkin wrote: >>> Never mind. I figured it out. The RTEMS_SYSINIT_ITEM() macro allows me to >>> insert initialization handlers to the loop that I mentioned earlier. >> Thank you for let us know. If you think the documentation in ... >> >> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/initialization.html >> >> .. could be improved we would welcome a patch. > > The question is, if this stuff is part of the API. The RTEMS_* name suggests > it, > however, I am not sure if we should make this a documented interface. >
I do not know, I suppose the test we should apply is what we are prepared to support, ie is the interface forward and backward compatibility? I, like you used RTEMS_* as a namespace but I do not think everything with RTEMS_* can be considered a formally supported interface. I do not know enough about the implementation here to comment on this specific item. Chris _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
