On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On 25/04/2018 23:48, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > To answer your m68k question...I can't find the post to gcc@ but there > are only > > a handful > > of ports using the cc and that is a barrier to future changes. The m68k, > v850, > > and a few > > others are at risk until the port is updated to use more modern gcc > internals. > > It was > > discussed that if these ports are not updated, they will be deprecated. > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-01/msg00089.html Thanks! We need to watch this topic because the mc68040 is more important than the mc68060 as a cutoff point. We may also want to consider what to do about 6830x and cpu32 variants. If we want those to stay, that may increase the cores needed a lot. That's effectively keeping the 68000 and 68020. > > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
