For this application (creating a symbol table for cexpsh)
--unresolved-symbols=ignore-all
is not dangerous but exactly what we want: find all symbols that are
exported by the start files
and the linker script.
The '?' results from symbols having been defined in sections that have
not linked any
input sections such as
.some_section {
some_section_begin = .;
*(.some_section*);
some_section_end = .;
}
If no '.some_section' is linked then the linker doesn't know how to classify
'some_section_begin/some_section_end' (data?, text?)
Traditionally we had defined such symbols *outside* of a section:
some_section_begin = .;
.some_section{
*(.some_section*);
}
some_section_end = .;
and I believe in this case they would be classified as 'A' (absolute;
not further relocated)
I realize that this is a fringe-use-case and a request to rewrite the
scripts seems unwarranted. A simple work-around is mapping '?' to 'A'
in the final 'startfiles.nm'.
- Till
On 09/05/2017 09:57 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/09/17 21:42, Jianxun Yan wrote:
Hi,
My application needs to compile linkcmds and create a symbols file.
Here are how I did.
$ arm-rtems4.11-g++
-B/home/yanjx/workspace/rtems411/arm-rtems4.11/altcycv_devkit/lib/
-specs bsp_specs -qrtems -Wall -O2 -g -march=armv7-a -mthumb
-mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp -mtune=cortex-a9 -I. -Invram
-nodefaultlibs -o o-optimize/startfiles.obj
-Wl,--unresolved-symbols=ignore-all -T`arm-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe
-B/home/yanjx/workspace/rtems411/arm-rtems4.11/altcycv_devkit/lib/
-specs bsp_specs -qrtems -print-file-name=linkcmds`
This -Wl,--unresolved-symbols=ignore-all sounds a bit dangerous.
$ arm-rtems4.11-nm -g -fposix o-optimize/startfiles.obj >
o-optimize/startfiles.nm
After created the startfiles.nm file, I found there some symbols with
unknown type of '?'
bsp_section_rodata_begin ? 00300204
bsp_section_rodata_end D 00300214
bsp_section_rodata_load_begin A 00300204
bsp_section_rodata_load_end A 00300214
bsp_section_rodata_size A 00000010
bsp_section_rwbarrier_align A 00100000
bsp_section_stack_begin ? 40000000
bsp_section_stack_end ? 40000000
......
__deregister_frame_info w
__dso_handle D 00401400
__exidx_end ? 00300204
__exidx_start ? 00300204
.....
Dose anyone know what causes the problem? and how to solve it?
Maybe these are the ignored undefined symbols?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
