On 07/23/2014 03:20 PM, JD wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On 23/07/2014 JD wrote: >>> >>> in /usr/bin, I have: >>> $ ls -l /usr/bin/*office* >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root jd 32 Jul 23 12:18 /usr/bin/ooffice -> >>> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice >>> >> >> This is a symlink you put there, right? > > YES. > Reason is that libreoffice has already stolen soffice in /usr/bin, > and believe it or not, it has also stolen ooffice. Both of which link > to libreoffice. So I broke the link /usr/bin/oofice -> libreoffice > and made it link to > /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.
Actually it is only the distro LO install that creates soffice links in the /usr/bin. distro maintainers leave/use: $ ls -l /usr/bin/*office* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Jun 18 06:02 /usr/bin/libreoffice -> ../lib/libreoffice/program/soffice -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53 Jun 18 04:25 /usr/bin/loffice lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Jun 18 06:02 /usr/bin/soffice -> ../lib/libreoffice/program/soffice The direct install of LO leaves: $ ls -l /usr/bin/*office* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Jul 25 14:22 /usr/bin/libreoffice4.3 -> /opt/libreoffice4.3/program/soffice I recommend just using the desktop file provided: <code> #!/usr/bin/env xdg-open [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Type=Application Terminal=false Icon[en_US]=/opt/openoffice4/program/logo.png Name[en_US]=OpenOffice Comment[en_US]=ApacheOpenOffice Exec=/opt/openoffice4/program/soffice Name=OpenOffice Comment=ApacheOpenOffice Icon=/opt/openoffice4/program/logo </code> and file a bug report against: /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice line 119: "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" & --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
