On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:50:51 -0500,
<[email protected]> wrote:
Agree - but the responsibility for the forking should be placed squarely
where it lies - on Oracle. Moreover, the forked paths would have
automatically rejoined had Oracle, when it decided to dump OOo, chosen to
assign it to the Document Foundation, which was already up and running
and
which requested that this be done. Instead, the firm decided to assign
all
the rights to Apache, in the knowledge that doing so would perpetuate the
fork. Thank you, Mr Ellison....
Henri
Another way to end the forking would be for the Document Foundation to
swallow their pride and join Apache. Why insist on playing Oracle’s game?
Why insist that there needs to be a fork when you could simply join Apache
and make OpenOffice better? Simply because you feel slighted or wanted to
be the heroes?
--
Sincerely,
Rod Lockwood
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
