Justin Miller-7 wrote:
>
> Does Orchestra require that Spring use cglib proxies rather than jdk
> proxies?
>
> It seems like no matter what I do, I can't get spring to use jdk
> proxies. My beans implement interfaces like they are supposed to, and
> I definitely do not have any proxy-target-class tags anywhere in my
> spring XML files.
>
> This isn't a huge deal. Everything still works. I just want to follow
> the recommendation that jdk proxies be used when possible.
>
As far as I know, jdk proxies should work. However I don't know of anyone
who has tried this; I certainly haven't.
JDK proxies of course only work for interfaces. The objects placed in
conversation scope are generally "backing beans" for pages, and these
normally aren't interfaces; the loose coupling already provided by EL means
there isn't a lot of point in a separate interface. So it seems to me that
in this case writing an interface definition for a backing bean is a lot of
work for very little benefit.
I suppose there could be a few more "business level" objects that could
usefully be in conversation scope, in which case there may well be a logical
interface for them. But I would certainly expect these to be the minority.
Do you expect to have lots of business-logic classes held within
conversation scope? If so, would you mind explaining why you take this
approach?
Regards, Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Orchestra--does-orchestra-require-that-Cglib-proxies-be-used-tp18652354p18685280.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
