Hi, thanks for replay!
I did a lot of test with it and in the end i tried to deploy the Trinidad's own demo app can be downloaded from Trinidad site. And PPR doesn't work neither in the demo app. Exactly what I noticed, that the tr:table component range navigation (next, previous links) and detail facet (show detail, hide detail, Show all details, Hide all details links) doesm't work. The logging shows that the server side actions performed, but the screen is not refreshed. Sometimes after an exact page refresh (F5) the desired screen displayed (next or previous range, displayed detail, etc). And i would emphasize again i can reproduce it with the Trinidad's own demo app. What do you think should be any diffrence in the weblogic environment? Our weblogic is an absolutely unpatched 9.2 version on a windows xp. Do you know whether your weblogic needed any patch for sucessfully run Trinidad PPR? And does your project use any of above mentioned features? As i could see in your thread about a year ago, you also had problems with Trinidad PPR on weblogic. Was that solved only with replace Trinidad version 1.0.1. with 1.0.7? Since my last mail i tried ADF Faces on weblogic and it worked. Almost the same code, just replace tr: with af: .... Francisco, if you have any suggestion, i would hihgly appreciate it! Thanks! On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Francisco Passos < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a working project running on Weblogic 9.2 with Trinidad 1.0.7. PPR > works fine and, dare I say, a whole lot faster than 1.0.1 used to, since it > now uses AJAX and several improvements have been made regarding bandwidth. > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Sandor Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've found only one thread among archives about Trinidad PPR doesn't work >> on Weblogic 9 or 10. Unfortunately that thread doesn't contain real >> solution. The suggestion changing content type from text/html to text/xml >> doesn't work for me. >> >> I tried it with the latest trinidad release 1.0.8. >> >> Is there any solution or workaround to this issue? Or should i choose >> another faces implementation for a weblogic project? >> >> As far as i can see, ADF faces has no problem with PPR on weblogic. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> > >
