It depends on what flavour of Trinidad you are using. I you use Tinidad 1.2.x (JSF 1.2 flavour) and work with JSP for rendering pages, it will not work in WAS 6.1 because WAS 6.1 Web Container is not Servlet 2.5 compliant. In order to make Trinidad 1.2.x (JSF 1.2 flavour) work in WAS 6.1, you need to use Facelets XHTML for View technology. Trinidad demos come in JSP, and as such fail in WAS 6.1. We have been working on WAS 6.1 with Trinidad 1.2.7 plus facelets 1.1.14.Make sure you change the class loader to parent class loader last. Bundle JSF-api, JSF-impl, and el-api jars along with your war, and have fun.
Regards, Samba On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Nutulapati, Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > Thanks for the info. > Now tomahawk sample is working in websphere. > However I need to imeplement the following scenario. > > A)Tree as one column with in the datatabale. > I know how to implement tree seperately using tomahawk,but not able to > find > A way to make tree working with in the datatable. > Your suggestions are appreciated. > Thanks > Krishna. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sidhik, Rosmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:19 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: RE: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? > Please Help > > Hi, > Look at the attached image: > Regards, > Rosmon > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nutulapati, Krishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 4:49 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: RE: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? > Please Help > > Hi Damon, > Good to hear from you. I'm looking for some who can share with me on > this issue. > I also tried trinidad samples, but end up with the same problem. > How to change the classloader mode? > If this change helps, I will do that right away,and retest the samples. > Please share your ideas. > Thanks > Krishna. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Damon Weyant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 2:30 PM > To: 'MyFaces Discussion' > Subject: RE: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? > Please Help > > Hello Krishna and all, > > I can't help you with the Trinidad part of the sample application you're > trying to run, but at my shop we're building applications using MyFaces > Core and Tomahawk to run on WAS v6.1, and we always get the "Both > MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath" message in our WAS console as > well. My understanding is that IBM created an implementation of JSF and > put those classes on the WAS classpath, so when you deploy an > application w/ MyFaces JAR files in it, that's the reason for the two > versions of JSF message. For each MyFaces-based application we have > running in WebSphere, we have set the Classloader mode to "PARENT_LAST" > (to find the MyFaces JSF implementation before the IBM one) and the WAS > classloader policy to "Application" to get the app to run in WAS v6.1. > > Have you tried to get an application using just Tomahawk or just > Trinidad to run on WAS v6.1? > > - Damon > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nutulapati, Krishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:23 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: FW: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? > Please Help > > > > Hi Mario, > Sorry I didn't understand what you meant by fixpack level. > If you have a little bit of time to test the sample application with > websphere6.1,I can forward you the sample. I'm unable to find a sample > that can work on websphere6.1 I'm usning the following jar files in the > sample example commons-beanutils.jar commons-codec-1.3.jar > commons-collections-3.2.jar commons-digester.jar commons-el-1.0.jar > commons-fileupload-1.0.jar commons-lang-2.4.jar > commons-logging-1.0.4.jar commons-validator-1.3.1.jar jstl-1.1.0.jar > myfaces-impl-1.1.5.jar oro-2.0.8.jar tomahawk-1.1.6.jar > > I'm getting following error in the console.with websphere,and seeing > just a blank screen from browser. > 4/24/08 17:35:59:135 CDT] 0000001e MyfacesConfig E > org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Jdk14Logger error Both MyFaces and the > RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use only one of the two > JSF-implementations. > The following are exact jar files I'm using. I did n't find where I'm > using 2 implementations of JSF. Can I have any suggestions? I indeed > appreciate your early response. > Does websphere6.1 not support tomahawk/trinidad? > I'm using jdk 5.0,websphere 6.1 . I did n't find any java compilation > errors in RAD though. > If I need to remove RI, what's the procedure? > Krishna. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:43 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? > Please Help > > What's your fixpack level? > Mario > > -----Original Message----- > From: Murtaza Goga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 aprile 2008 16.07 > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: RE: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? > Please Help > > Not sure what your error is, but you might want to consider setting the > classloader on the web module to PARENT_LAST. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nutulapati, Krishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:49 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Does Trinidad/Tomahawk samples work with websphere 6.1? Please > Help > > > Hello All, > Can any of you suggest whether you used/developed Trinidad/Tomahawk > samples tested on websphere6.1. > > I'm unable to run even a single trinidad/tomahawk samples on > websphere6.1... If you guys having any success Please update me. If you > update with a small sample working in websphere6.1, it would be indeed a > gr8 help. > Thanks Guys, > Krishna. > > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete > the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. > > >
