Thanks for any comment, -- Renzo
Hi all, I'm working on an application which mimics the behavior of
modern (non-web GUI) wizards.
Basically there is a single page containing side-by-side panels (like
frames) plus a number of popup panels.
Users are allowed to move a panel between those tho sets, as well as to
minimize, maximize, drag and resize panels.
Actual panel contents are runtime-defined after user actions on buttons
and popup menus, thus there is a massive usage of Facelets composition
components (but no templates) and ui:include. Heavy usage of js
machinery is needed too.
Trinidad is very good for my purposes but - as a matter of efficiency -
PPR should be used everywhere, so that single panels contents only
should be refreshed upon any user action, not the entire page. Basically
there is no reason to refresh the entire page, except for changing locale.
Here comes the point: this approach requires using partialSubmit="true"
on *all* buttons/links, while addPartialTarget() defines later what to
return as a PPR response.
I already use this way for panel refreshing in selected cases without
problems but now I would generalize this approach.
But addPartialTarget() requires a component to be specified, and the
only way I know of to get a component is through the binding attribute.
This has some unpleasant side-effects with Facelets, and it cannot be
used within iterating components (stamping) since inner components are
defined at rendering time.
In general - it's from action processing (within beans) that I have to
decide upon which component will be a partial target.
In many cases there is no need to return anything: e.i. while removing a
panel, the DOM is updated by js and the concerned bean needs to know
about the dropped panel. No PPR response is needed and the result is
very fast.
- [Trinidad] about using PPR everywhere on a panel-driven pa... Renzo Tomaselli
- Re: [Trinidad] about using PPR everywhere on a panel-... Scott O'Bryan
- Re: [Trinidad] about using PPR everywhere on a pa... Renzo Tomaselli

