hrm, perhaps the different solutions don't work well together... Doesn't RichFaces provide a client side validation ?
On 11/7/07, Sansaricq Marcel-EMS002 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, > However, as soon as I add this context param in my web.xml and test my > application, all AJAX functionality provided by RichFaces components > stop working. > > Any idea if this can be resolved ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11/07/2007 03:28 > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: Client side validation > > Hi, > > You can enable it by the flag; > > <context-param> > > <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.ENABLE_CLIENT_SIDE_VALIDATION</param-name > > > <param-value>true</param-value> > </context-param> > > Then you dont have to change anything in your page, it should start > working:) > > Immediate commands just skip it. > > Cagatay, > > On Nov 6, 2007 11:01 PM, Sansaricq Marcel-EMS002 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Cagatay, > > > > I am trying to figure out how to use the sandbox client side > validation > > by looking at the source code of the examples on the irian web site. > > > > More specifically, the code below is for the "Conversion&Validation > with > > Standard Form". > > > > Can you clarify what triggers client side validation in the example > > below ? > > > > Or maybe you can elaborate on how to best use it. > > > > Thanks again, > > > > Marcel > > > > <%@ page session="false" contentType="text/html;charset=utf-8"%> > > <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"; prefix="h"%> > > <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"; prefix="f"%> > > <%@ taglib uri="http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk"; prefix="t"%> > > <%@ taglib uri="http://myfaces.apache.org/sandbox"; prefix="s"%> > > <html> > > > > <!-- > > /* > > * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > > * distributed with this work for additional information > > * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > > * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > > * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > > * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > * > > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > * > > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > > * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > > * specific language governing permissions and limitations > > * under the License. > > */ > > //--> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] file="inc/head.inc" %> > > > > <body> > > > > <f:view> > > > > <h:form id="carForm"> > > > > <t:messages forceSpan="true" layout="list" /> > > > > <h:panelGrid columns="3"> > > <h:outputText id="lbl_id" value="Id > > *"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_id" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.id}" > required="true"></h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_id" forceSpan="true" /> > > > > <h:outputText id="lbl_name" value="Name > > *"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_name" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.name}" > > required="true"></h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_name" forceSpan="true" /> > > > > <h:outputText id="lbl_surname" value="Surname > > *"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_surname" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.surname}" > > required="true"></h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_surname" forceSpan="true" > /> > > > > <h:outputText id="lbl_age" > > value="Age"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_age" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.age}"> > > <f:validateLongRange minimum="18" > > maximum="50" /> > > </h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_age" forceSpan="true" /> > > > > <h:outputText id="lbl_address" > > value="Adress"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_address" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.address}"> > > <f:validateLength minimum="2" > > maximum="5"/> > > </h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_address" forceSpan="true" > /> > > > > <h:outputText id="lbl_salary" > > value="Salary"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_salary" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.salary}"> > > <f:validateDoubleRange minimum="1000" > > maximum="5000" /> > > </h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_salary" forceSpan="true" > /> > > > > <h:outputText id="lbl_salaryBonus" > value="Salary > > Bonus"></h:outputText> > > <h:inputText id="txt_salaryBonus" > > value="#{customerCreateBean.customer.salaryBonus}"> > > </h:inputText> > > <t:message for="txt_salaryBonus" > > forceSpan="true" /> > > </h:panelGrid> > > > > <h:commandButton id="btn_save" value="Create" > > action=""/> > > <t:commandButton id="btn_cancel" value="Cancel" > > immediate="true"></t:commandButton> > > > > </h:form> > > > > </f:view> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] file="inc/page_footer.jsp" %> > > > > </body> > > > > </html> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11/06/2007 09:59 > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > Subject: Re: Client side validation > > > > > > Hello, > > > > The successor of the jsf-comp's client side converter/validators > > joined the myfaces sandbox. > > > > > http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20071106/home.jsf#ClientSideVali > > dation > > > > Regards, > > > > Cagatay > > > > On Nov 6, 2007 4:54 PM, Sansaricq Marcel-EMS002 > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I am currently using MyFaces 1.1.5, along with Tomahawk 1.1.6 and > > RichFaces > > > 3.1.0 and I want to use client side validation in my project. > Trinidad > > seems > > > to provide the features I need, however, based on the warnings I see > > about > > > using RichFaces and Trinidad together mainly because of AJAX > problems, > > I am > > > hesitant to use Trinidad. Due to project deadlines, I don't want to > > migrate > > > from RichFaces AJAX components to Trinidad at this time. > > > > > > It looks like the jsf-comp client validator work that Cagatay Civici > > has > > > done is no longer in development, so it's not a viable option. > > > > > > Any alternate method of using Client side validation that meshes > well > > with > > > jsf will be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your help > > > > > > Marcel > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
