I just checked demo files and we don't use a TimeZone setting in
trinidad-config.xml, so my hunch wasn't good.

On 9/16/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If that's the sole issue, then yes it should fix it.
>
> On 9/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sounds like that could be it -seeing as it affects all instances.
> > Not to sound too stupid, but i take it that this can be addressed by
> > applying a timezone object to the inputDate through the use of the
> > convertDateTime tag?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Simon Lessard < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Sunday, 16 September, 2007 4:36:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: tr:inputDate
> >
> > My hunch would be the timezone setting. I don't have access to SVN and
> > source right now to check, but if the TimeZone use the 3-char format (
> > i.e. EST or PST), then daylight saving is ignored (and we're currently
> > under daylight saving), resulting in hour hour lost. Since we set the date
> > using midnight (0:00:00,000), losing 1 hours means going back one day.
> >
> > I plan to check out on that while fixing the first day of week issue to
> > see if there's a way to prevent such issues.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> > On 9/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >  It also happens with the live demos, which is weird...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: Leonardo Uribe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, 16 September, 2007 12:00:19 AM
> > > Subject: Re: tr:inputDate
> > >
> > >
> > >    and also if i click the first available date (in this case
> > > > 16/09/2007), it populates the field with 15/09/2007.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I remember this issue. Are you using java.sql.Date as the type for the
> > > property in the bean? I just changed it for java.util.Date and
> > > all works well for me.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Leonardo Uribe
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to