That's what I suggested, and Adam and Matt disagreed on. At least I
thought so ;)

One more hint why I think this would be appropriate: it shouldn't have
been a trinidadinternal parameter in the beginning, so I'd think we
shouldn't force users to take action on fixing a mistake we've been
making. However, I do also see the added value of a consistent set of
configuration parameters which are the same everywhere, so I stop
discussing right now ;)

regards,

Martin

On 9/8/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not keep the old one and the new one and just mark the old one as
> deprecated for the next release? If both are set, the new one could
> take precedence.
>
> On 9/7/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Matt, Adam,
> >
> > well, it's your call - but there are quite a few people out there who
> > will have used this parameter already. Have fun answering their mails
> > ;))
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 9/5/07, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I agree with Adam.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/4/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The old parameter was "trinidadinternal", and therefore was
> > > > never officially supported.  If we were changing from one
> > > > supported name to another, I'd agree that we should keep the
> > > > old name around, but supporting backwards compatibility
> > > > for anything "trinidadinternal" is a precedent I don't think we
> > > > should set...
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/31/07, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Danny,
> > > > >
> > > > > eventually we could additionally support also the old name for the
> > > > > configuration parameter, and only phase this out in a major release?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/28/07, Danny Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > In the hope of pre-empting some emails, be aware that the trunk has
> > > switched
> > > > > > to now use the following config setting for disabling skin
> > > compression.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION
> > > > > > became
> > > > > >
> > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The docs and release notes in trunk also mention this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Danny
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Chordiant Software Inc.
> > > > > >  www.chordiant.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to