On 9/4/07, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like that name too. Should the text for it be "text" like on other > components or "caption"?
We already have an example of convenience-attribute+facet on column; there it's "header" and "headerText". So perhaps the facet should be "caption" and the attribute "captionText". -- Adam > > Regarding this example mentioned earlier: > > <tr:panelFormLayout> > <tr:panelCaptionGroup caption="Personal Details"> > <tr:inputText.../> > </tr:panelCaptionGroup> > </tr:panelFormLayout> > > this could potentially be supported but without the lines drawn along the > sides. I'm thinking that when placed directly inside of a panelFormLayout, > it could have the simple separator lines (exactly like tr:group today) but > with the caption appearing on top of the upper separator line, e.g.: > > label1 field1 > -- Caption ----- > label2 field2 > label3 field3 > ---------------- > label4 field4 > > and when outside of a panelFormLayout (as in your proposal) where you don't > have to play well with the table structure of the form layout, the > PanelCaptionGroupRenderer will use the normal fieldset elements. > > Regards, > Matt > > > On 9/4/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/4/07, Danny Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yeah, I initially went with the enhanced panelFormLayout approach and > > > decided against it. > > > > > > The name is also frustrating, so how about <tr:panelCaptionGroup ...>? > > > > I think I like that name. > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > I'll give it 24hrs for other people to chime in, then I'll go with the > > > above. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > On 9/4/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yep, I agree that the Layout suffix shouldn't be there. > > > > I'm wondering if we want a name more abstracted from > > > > the HTML "fieldset" concept, though none really > > > > come to mind. > > > > > > > > Or, as a perhaps more radical suggestion, could this be > > > > something embedded inside panelFormLayout? Like if > > > > we supported "caption" on af:group? > > > > > > > > <af:panelFormLayout> > > > > <af:group caption="Personal Details"> > > > > <af:inputText.../> > > > > </af:group> > > > > </af:panelFormLayout> > > > > > > > > This has some major disadvantages, though. It's probably > > > > significantly harder to implement (more grunge in the > > > > already grungy PanelFormLayout code) and no way to use it > > > > outside of panelFormLayout. So I've probably just talked myself > > > > out of this suggestion. :) > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/30/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > Hello Danny, > > > > > > > > > > True, panelBox does not include the Layout suffix (a fact I somehow > > > > > forgotten / overlooked), so stripping the Layout suffix is fine with > me. > > > I > > > > > like the attribute shortcut for the legend as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/30/07, Danny Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I knocked together this component to see what it would look like > and > > > what > > > > > skin selectors would be required. Here's some tag examples and an > > > attached > > > > > screenshot. > > > > > > > > > > > > FWIW while Simon's name suggestion was better, I'm not fan of the > > > 'Layout' > > > > > suffix, as it doesn't actually perform layout, and is therefore > closer > > > in > > > > > functionality to panelBox. > > > > > > > > > > > > <tr:panelFieldsetLayout captionText="Personal > > > Details"> > > > > > > <tr:panelFormLayout> > > > > > > <tr:inputText label="First Name" /> > > > > > > <tr:inputText label="Middle Initial" > > > columns="1"/> > > > > > > <tr:inputText label="Family Name" /> > > > > > > <tr:selectOneChoice label="Suffix" /> > > > > > > </tr:panelFormLayout> > > > > > > </tr:panelFieldsetLayout> > > > > > > > > > > > > OR > > > > > > <tr:panelFieldsetLayout > > > > > > captionText="This shouldn't appear"> > > > > > > <f:facet name="caption"> > > > > > > <tr:icon name="error" /> > > > > > > </f:facet> > > > > > > <tr:inputDate label="Date of Birth" /> > > > > > > </tr:panelFieldsetLayout> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts anyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/29/07, Simon Lessard < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Danny, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer something along the lines of > tr:panelFieldSetLayout > > > with > > > > > a legend facet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/29/07, Danny Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Would there be interest in a skinnable/ajaxified component > that > > > > > rendered output using html fieldset/legend. We'd like to include > this > > > in > > > > > our applications and I'm keen to keep our users away from > introducing > > > other > > > > > component libraries just for the odd extra component. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm struggling to think of a nice sounding tag name, other > than > > > > > tr:panelBoxAndLegend but it could look something like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <tr:panelBoxAndLegend title="The legend"> > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > </tr:panelBoxAndLegend> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Chordiant Software Inc. > > > > > > > > www.chordiant.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Chordiant Software Inc. > > > > > > www.chordiant.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Chordiant Software Inc. > > > www.chordiant.com > > > >
