Thanks your promptly reply. Yes, agree your point and actually I hv same
thought as yours.But I think to a well-known product, there should be a
list to announce the browser compatibility, instead we make the supposition
base on our limited information. You know, sometimes, we need the official
stuff as our reference to support our decision.
From: David Delbecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: MyFaces Browser Compatibility
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:32:01 +0200
I don't tink there is.
AFAIK, most myfaces core component don't require javascript and use
html4.01 compliant output, and as such would work with most browsers (am
pretty sure it could even work with lynx). Only exception is the
CommandLink, but it's javascript is quite basic and should also be
compatibile with most existing javascript enabled browser.
Concerning tomahakw, it's more tricky, some components don't require
javascript (like fileupload) but some do havily use javascript. For them
you should check the bugtrack for any reported issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK
En l'instant précis du 04/07/07 03:17, mark leung s'exprimait en ces
termes:
> Hi there,
> Is there anybody know the browser compatibility of MyFaces(Tomahawk)?
> I can
> not find the documents about this topic in MyFaces homepage and
> google. While there is only the compatibility about server side
> environment.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> 与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn
_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn
