This convention makes sense. I wish it was more clearly documented though, and easier to find the rule behind this convention.
Even the command line --help almost suggest that it is possible to do this update. Regardless, I agree with this convention, and the reason behind it. Thank you very much. -M -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez Sent: Mon 10/6/2008 7:06 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: maven repository update. no, there is not. Artifacts are not supposed to change after being released. You'd have to manually copy/delete the file On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Marco Villalobos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have a repository called Red, and a build machine called Ark. > > > > Naturally, when you do a build, Ark has its own local repository. > > > > Somebody deployed artifact widget-1.1 to Red. > > > > Ark already has widget-1.1 in its local repository. But it is an older > version. You can tell by its date timestamp. The version of widget-1.1 > in Red is newer, and correct. > > > > Is there a way to tell maven to analyze the date, and update the local > repository with the newer version? > > > > We tried mvn -U, but that did not work. > > > > Thank you. > > > > -M > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
