Hi Thomas! On Friday 25 April 2008 Arand, Thomas (NSN - DE/Muenich) wrote: > Is that really the only way to deal with that? > 1. has the disadvantage that some other project indeed may need the > server dependencies (e.g. the artifact to package an ear). With this > solution one would have to repeat the dependency in that other project, > what is definitely not wanted.
While I agree with you that the 2 provided solutions are more workarounds than solutions, I have to say that if a project needs some server dependencies, it has to declare it anyway and should not rely on transitiv dependencies. > 2. would require exclude statements in all other projects using the > client part. This is also definitely not wanted. > > Is there the need for a maven improvement? Unfortunately not that I know of :-( - martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
