---- Stephen Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Don't use the borked j2ee.jar from the java.net or java.net2 maven > repositories. > > I had the same problem. Basically, the j2ee.jar on the java.net repos is > not a real jar, just stripped classes that have no method bodies, but just > the method definitions. > > The borked jar is only good for compiling. I had an argument with the guy > who posted it where I pointed out > "why-the-f*ck-would-you-want-a-jar-that-you-cannot-run-unit-tests-against-in-a-maven-repository" > and he seemed to think that not running unit tests was a perfectly valid use > case and sure nobody using maven runs unit tests all the time, and sure > could they not just compile and package the jar... > > He did not seem to get the whole lifecycle thing about maven2 at all
Sigh. Thanks for trying Stephen.. Wouldn't this be a good case for a classifier? eg <classifier>apionly</classifier> Then people who want this strange compile-but-not-run dependency can have it... Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
