On 09/01/2008, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 14:23 +0100, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > > Thanks a lot for all the feedback ! > > > > I am still not completely convinced ... see below. > > > > On 09/01/2008, Beelen, M. - SPLXL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ïn my opition the cycle you mention where the snake bites it's tail" can > > > only be a real problem is you actually do have circular dependencies, > > > which often isn't the case. > > > I assume that although you have inter-dependencies in your libraries > > > those dependencies are not circular. > > > > Actually, we do have quite a few circular dependencies (old project, > > legacy code, we wont clean everything anytime soon). We have to live > > with them ;-( > > If you really have odd dependency structures, then Maven might not be > right for you. Maven has a clear idea of what "best practice" is, and is > not infinitely configurable. The infinitely-configurable build tool is > called Ant.
Yep, I know that ... ;-) But the decision to migrate to Maven has been taken higher up, and now we have to move along ... It might be painful, but we dont have that much choice on the matter ... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jabber : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype : Guillaume.Lederrey Projects : * http://rwanda.wordpress.com/ * http://rwandatech.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
